



@article {2250,
	title = {In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics},
	journal = {forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {15},
	abstract = {<p><span style="font-family: \&quot;Lucida Grande\&quot;, helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14.4px;">In a recent result, Frauchiger and Renner argue that if quantum theory accurately describes complex systems like observers who perform measurements, then \&quot;we are forced to give up the view that there is one single reality.\&quot; Following a review of the Frauchiger-Renner argument, I argue that quantum mechanics should be understood probabilistically, as a new sort of non-Boolean probability theory, rather than representationally, as a theory about the elementary constituents of the physical world and how these elements evolve dynamically over time. I show that this way of understanding quantum mechanics is not in conflict with a consistent \&quot;single-world\&quot; interpretation of the theory.</span></p>},
	url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03267},
	author = {Jeffrey Bub}
}
