



01894nas a2200301   4500008004100000245006400041210006300105260001400168520102800182100001601210700001701226700001801243700002101261700002201282700001601304700001701320700002201337700003001359700002201389700001901411700002101430700001801451700001801469700002301487700002101510700002401531856003701555       2021                        eng d00aCross-Platform Comparison of Arbitrary Quantum Computations0 aCrossPlatform Comparison of Arbitrary Quantum Computations  c7/27/20213 a<p>As we approach the era of quantum advantage, when quantum computers (QCs) can outperform any classical computer on particular tasks, there remains the difficult challenge of how to validate their performance. While algorithmic success can be easily verified in some instances such as number factoring or oracular algorithms, these approaches only provide pass/fail information for a single QC. On the other hand, a comparison between different QCs on the same arbitrary circuit provides a lower-bound for generic validation: a quantum computation is only as valid as the agreement between the results produced on different QCs. Such an approach is also at the heart of evaluating metrological standards such as disparate atomic clocks. In this paper, we report a cross-platform QC comparison using randomized and correlated measurements that results in a wealth of information on the QC systems. We execute several quantum circuits on widely different physical QC platforms and analyze the cross-platform fidelities.</p>1 aZhu, Daiwei1 aCian, Ze-Pei1 aNoel, Crystal1 aRisinger, Andrew1 aBiswas, Debopriyo1 aEgan, Laird1 aZhu, Yingyue1 aGreen, Alaina, M.1 aAlderete, Cinthia, Huerta1 aNguyen, Nhung, H.1 aWang, Qingfeng1 aMaksymov, Andrii1 aNam, Yunseong1 aCetina, Marko1 aLinke, Norbert, M.1 aHafezi, Mohammad1 aMonroe, Christopher  uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2107.1138701622nas a2200145   4500008004100000245008500041210006900126260001400195520114800209100002201357700002101379700002101400700001801421856003701439       2021                        eng d00aEfficient quantum programming using EASE gates on a trapped-ion quantum computer0 aEfficient quantum programming using EASE gates on a trappedion q  c7/15/20213 a<p>Parallel operations in conventional computing have proven to be an essential tool for efficient and practical computation, and the story is not different for quantum computing. Indeed, there exists a large body of works that study advantages of parallel implementations of quantum gates for efficient quantum circuit implementations. Here, we focus on the recently invented efficient, arbitrary, simultaneously entangling (EASE) gates, available on a trapped-ion quantum computer. Leveraging its flexibility in selecting arbitrary pairs of qubits to be coupled with any degrees of entanglement, all in parallel, we show a n-qubit Clifford circuit can be implemented using 6log(n) EASE gates, a n-qubit multiply-controlled NOT gate can be implemented using 3n/2 EASE gates, and a n-qubit permutation can be implemented using six EASE gates. We discuss their implications to near-term quantum chemistry simulations and the state of the art pattern matching algorithm. Given Clifford + multiply-controlled NOT gates form a universal gate set for quantum computing, our results imply efficient quantum computation by EASE gates, in general.</p>1 aGrzesiak, Nikodem1 aMaksymov, Andrii1 aNiroula, Pradeep1 aNam, Yunseong  uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07591