02013nas a2200277 4500008004100000245008100041210006900122260001300191300001300204490000600217520120300223100002301426700001801449700002001467700002101487700002001508700002001528700001701548700002101565700001401586700001701600700002401617700002001641700001501661856005901676 2022 eng d00aQuantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling0 aQuantum computational advantage via highdimensional Gaussian bos c1/5/2022 aeabi78940 v83 a

A programmable quantum computer based on fiber optics outperforms classical computers with a high level of confidence. Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating a quantum computational advantage (QCA) by outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing proposals and demonstrations face challenges. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. We provide evidence for the hardness of GBS, comparable to the strongest theoretical proposals for QCA. We also propose a QCA architecture we call high-dimensional GBS, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss using few optical components. We show that particular algorithms for simulating GBS are outperformed by high-dimensional GBS experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCA with programmable photonic processors.

1 aDeshpande, Abhinav1 aMehta, Arthur1 aVincent, Trevor1 aQuesada, Nicolas1 aHinsche, Marcel1 aIoannou, Marios1 aMadsen, Lars1 aLavoie, Jonathan1 aQi, Haoyu1 aEisert, Jens1 aHangleiter, Dominik1 aFefferman, Bill1 aDhand, Ish uhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abi789402003nas a2200253 4500008004100000245008100041210006900122260001400191520125700205100002301462700001801485700002001503700002101523700002001544700002001564700001701584700002101601700001401622700001701636700002401653700002001677700001501697856003701712 2021 eng d00aQuantum Computational Supremacy via High-Dimensional Gaussian Boson Sampling0 aQuantum Computational Supremacy via HighDimensional Gaussian Bos c2/24/20213 a

Photonics is a promising platform for demonstrating quantum computational supremacy (QCS) by convincingly outperforming the most powerful classical supercomputers on a well-defined computational task. Despite this promise, existing photonics proposals and demonstrations face significant hurdles. Experimentally, current implementations of Gaussian boson sampling lack programmability or have prohibitive loss rates. Theoretically, there is a comparative lack of rigorous evidence for the classical hardness of GBS. In this work, we make significant progress in improving both the theoretical evidence and experimental prospects. On the theory side, we provide strong evidence for the hardness of Gaussian boson sampling, placing it on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for QCS. On the experimental side, we propose a new QCS architecture, high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling, which is programmable and can be implemented with low loss rates using few optical components. We show that particular classical algorithms for simulating GBS are vastly outperformed by high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling experiments at modest system sizes. This work thus opens the path to demonstrating QCS with programmable photonic processors.

1 aDeshpande, Abhinav1 aMehta, Arthur1 aVincent, Trevor1 aQuesada, Nicolas1 aHinsche, Marcel1 aIoannou, Marios1 aMadsen, Lars1 aLavoie, Jonathan1 aQi, Haoyu1 aEisert, Jens1 aHangleiter, Dominik1 aFefferman, Bill1 aDhand, Ish uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2102.1247401947nas a2200397 4500008004100000245005400041210005400095260001500149520085000164100001801014700001601032700002301048700002301071700002201094700002401116700001901140700001801159700001801177700002001195700002501215700001801240700001801258700001901276700001901295700001601314700002301330700001901353700001701372700002401389700001901413700002201432700001901454700001901473700002001492856003701512 2019 eng d00aQuantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery0 aQuantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery c12/16/20193 a

The great promise of quantum computers comes with the dual challenges of building them and finding their useful applications. We argue that these two challenges should be considered together, by co-designing full stack quantum computer systems along with their applications in order to hasten their development and potential for scientific discovery. In this context, we identify scientific and community needs, opportunities, and significant challenges for the development of quantum computers for science over the next 2-10 years. This document is written by a community of university, national laboratory, and industrial researchers in the field of Quantum Information Science and Technology, and is based on a summary from a U.S. National Science Foundation workshop on Quantum Computing held on October 21-22, 2019 in Alexandria, VA.

1 aAlexeev, Yuri1 aBacon, Dave1 aBrown, Kenneth, R.1 aCalderbank, Robert1 aCarr, Lincoln, D.1 aChong, Frederic, T.1 aDeMarco, Brian1 aEnglund, Dirk1 aFarhi, Edward1 aFefferman, Bill1 aGorshkov, Alexey, V.1 aHouck, Andrew1 aKim, Jungsang1 aKimmel, Shelby1 aLange, Michael1 aLloyd, Seth1 aLukin, Mikhail, D.1 aMaslov, Dmitri1 aMaunz, Peter1 aMonroe, Christopher1 aPreskill, John1 aRoetteler, Martin1 aSavage, Martin1 aThompson, Jeff1 aVazirani, Umesh uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1912.0757701599nas a2200133 4500008004100000245006800041210006800109520117300177100001801350700002001368700002001388700002001408856003701428 2018 eng d00aQuantum Supremacy and the Complexity of Random Circuit Sampling0 aQuantum Supremacy and the Complexity of Random Circuit Sampling3 a

A critical milestone on the path to useful quantum computers is quantum supremacy - a demonstration of a quantum computation that is prohibitively hard for classical computers. A leading near-term candidate, put forth by the Google/UCSB team, is sampling from the probability distributions of randomly chosen quantum circuits, which we call Random Circuit Sampling (RCS). In this paper we study both the hardness and verification of RCS. While RCS was defined with experimental realization in mind, we show complexity theoretic evidence of hardness that is on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for supremacy. Specifically, we show that RCS satisfies an average-case hardness condition - computing output probabilities of typical quantum circuits is as hard as computing them in the worst-case, and therefore #P-hard. Our reduction exploits the polynomial structure in the output amplitudes of random quantum circuits, enabled by the Feynman path integral. In addition, it follows from known results that RCS satisfies an anti-concentration property, making it the first supremacy proposal with both average-case hardness and anti-concentration. 

1 aBouland, Adam1 aFefferman, Bill1 aNirkhe, Chinmay1 aVazirani, Umesh uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1803.0440200861nas a2200121 4500008004100000245005500041210005500096260001500151520049300166100002000659700002400679856003600703 2016 eng d00aQuantum Merlin Arthur with Exponentially Small Gap0 aQuantum Merlin Arthur with Exponentially Small Gap c2016/01/083 aWe study the complexity of QMA proof systems with inverse exponentially small promise gap. We show that this class can be exactly characterized by PSPACE, the class of problems solvable with a polynomial amount of memory. As applications we show that a "precise" version of the Local Hamiltonian problem is PSPACE-complete, and give a provable setting in which the ability to prepare PEPS states is not as powerful as the ability to prepare the ground state of general Local Hamiltonians.1 aFefferman, Bill1 aLin, Cedric, Yen-Yu uhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1601.0197502209nas a2200121 4500008004100000245002700041210002400068260001500092520190500107100001902012700002002031856003602051 2016 eng d00aOn Quantum Obfuscation0 aQuantum Obfuscation c2016/02/043 aEncryption of data is fundamental to secure communication in the modern world. Beyond encryption of data lies obfuscation, i.e., encryption of functionality. It is well-known that the most powerful means of obfuscating classical programs, so-called ``black-box obfuscation',' is provably impossible [Barak et al '12]. However, several recent results have yielded candidate schemes that satisfy a definition weaker than black-box, and yet still have numerous applications. In this work, we initialize the rigorous study of obfuscating programs via quantum-mechanical means. We define notions of quantum obfuscation which encompass several natural variants. The input to the obfuscator can describe classical or quantum functionality, and the output can be a circuit description or a quantum state. The obfuscator can also satisfy one of a number of obfuscation conditions: black-box, information-theoretic black-box, indistinguishability, and best possible; the last two conditions come in three variants: perfect, statistical, and computational. We discuss many applications, including CPA-secure quantum encryption, quantum fully-homomorphic encryption, and public-key quantum money. We then prove several impossibility results, extending a number of foundational papers on classical obfuscation to the quantum setting. We prove that quantum black-box obfuscation is impossible in a setting where adversaries can possess more than one output of the obfuscator. In particular, generic transformation of quantum circuits into black-box-obfuscated quantum circuits is impossible. We also show that statistical indistinguishability obfuscation is impossible, up to an unlikely complexity-theoretic collapse. Our proofs involve a new tool: chosen-ciphertext-secure encryption of quantum data, which was recently shown to be possible assuming quantum-secure one-way functions exist [Alagic et al '16].1 aAlagic, Gorjan1 aFefferman, Bill uhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1602.0177101003nas a2200121 4500008004100000245005600041210005600097260001500153520063800168100002000806700001900826856003600845 2015 eng d00aQuantum vs Classical Proofs and Subset Verification0 aQuantum vs Classical Proofs and Subset Verification c2015/10/223 aWe study the ability of efficient quantum verifiers to decide properties of exponentially large subsets given either a classical or quantum witness. We develop a general framework that can be used to prove that QCMA machines, with only classical witnesses, cannot verify certain properties of subsets given implicitly via an oracle. We use this framework to prove an oracle separation between QCMA and QMA using an ``in-place'' permutation oracle, making the first progress on this question since Aaronson and Kuperberg in 2007. We also use the framework to prove a particularly simple standard oracle separation between QCMA and AM.1 aFefferman, Bill1 aKimmel, Shelby uhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1510.06750